Editorial: Waging war with Iran is in no one's best interest
Published in Op Eds
The U.S. and Iran are hurtling toward a conflict neither ostensibly wants but both seem unable to avoid. The long-standing rivals ought to pause and think carefully about where their true interests lie.
After weeks of buildup, two U.S. carrier groups and squadrons of advanced fighters and bombers are now poised to launch massive air and missile strikes against the Islamic Republic. In theory, the two sides are negotiating a deal to address U.S. demands, which presumably were conveyed during recent talks in Geneva. But a military deployment this large carries a momentum all its own. The president has already warned he may order a more narrowly targeted strike while negotiations are ongoing to demonstrate his seriousness. If Iran plays for time or refuses to meet U.S. red lines, as seems likely, he will face immense pressure to launch a more wide-ranging attack to maintain U.S. credibility.
Yet the White House may be reaching the limits of its gunboat diplomacy. At this point, a limited initial strike is more likely to convince the regime that it needs to hit back hard to restore deterrence than to compromise. A broader campaign could degrade what remains of Iran’s nuclear facilities and the infrastructure to make and launch ballistic missiles, and perhaps even eliminate top regime figures. But there’s little evidence airstrikes alone would topple the government, or that whatever came next would be better. Iranian retaliation would inevitably impose costs on U.S. forces and allies in the region, especially Israel. And, given time, an even more paranoid and aggressive regime would rebuild its arsenal.
The administration deserves credit for pursuing diplomacy. But its demands ought to be clear and realistic — not to mention shared with Congress and the American public before committing U.S. troops to battle. If, as the president’s comments suggest, the priority is to limit Iran’s pathways to a nuclear weapon, a few conditions will be critical: no advanced centrifuges on Iranian soil, unrestricted access for international inspectors, and a full accounting and disposal of the roughly 440 kilograms of highly enriched uranium presumed to have been buried by U.S. and Israeli strikes last year.
If Iran continues to insist that its ballistic missiles and support for proxy groups such as Hezbollah and the Houthis can only be discussed with its Arab neighbors, it should be reminded that nonnuclear sanctions won’t be lifted until those concerns are resolved. The regime will need to show greater flexibility if it’s to have any hope of reviving a faltering economy, the spark for widespread protests around the new year.
Whether out of pride, ideological zeal or an instinct to haggle for even the tiniest advantage, Iranian leaders will be tempted to stall — to drag out negotiations, fob off the U.S. with flashy promises and try to trip up their American counterparts in highly technical details. They’ll also be reluctant to offer substantive concessions for fear this administration or future ones will only reimpose sanctions later.
Regardless, they should consider the costs of repeating this familiar pattern. Although Iran can cause pain to the U.S. and Israel, it will pay the highest price if hostilities escalate. At best, it would emerge badly weakened and isolated, and even more vulnerable to future strikes. If the regime survives, officials will have to explain to an angry populace why they chose to fight for the right to pour billions into a domestic enrichment program that produces no nuclear power and into Arab proxies that were easily crushed by Israel instead of investing in their roughly 90 million citizens.
Before openly slaughtering thousands of protesters last month, Iran’s leaders had rejected chance after chance to improve the lives of their own people. If they do so again, they’ll have themselves to blame for the consequences.
____
The Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
©2026 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com/opinion. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.






















































Comments