Editorial: Democrats embrace write-off that favors high earners

The Editorial Board, Las Vegas Review-Journal on Apr 9, 2026

Published in Op Eds

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

Tax day is nearly upon us, reigniting the debate over President Donald Trump’s tax cuts, passed in 2017 and extended last year. In a front-page story last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that last year’s legislation is “delivering bigger refunds and smaller tax bills to high-income Democratic-leaning regions that didn’t vote” for Trump.

The implication is that the Republican tax reform was intended as a sop to the rich and designed to favor only the president’s supporters. In fact, a Tax Foundation analysis found that the tax legislation “will reduce federal taxes on average for individual taxpayers in every state.”

Meanwhile, the Treasury Department reported in March that nearly 45 percent of filed returns claimed at least one of the new tax cuts, which include certain exemptions for overtime and tip income and an enhanced standard deduction for seniors.

Democrats who insist that the GOP bill was a gift to the rich are arguing against themselves. As the Journal notes, the primary reason many wealthy blue state residents will benefit is a provision in the tax bill that quadruples how much in state and local levies an individual wage earner may write-off on his or her federal return. Known as the SALT deduction, this loophole helps big-spending politicians in progressive states minimize the pain of their profligate spending.

Prior to 2017, there was no cap on the deduction, a massive benefit for the wealthy in high-tax states such as New York and California. Trump’s first-term tax bill limited the benefit to $10,000. Democrats were unhappy, worried that residents in deep blue jurisdictions might revolt if they were forced to bear the full brunt of the heavy state and local tax burden. “Trump’s SALT cap made their high taxes transparent to everyone — and politically costly,” Mario Loyola of the Heritage Foundation noted in 2025.

Democrats last year found allies among GOP House members from red districts in progressive states. In order to generate enough Republican votes to pass the 2025 extension, the SALT cap was increased as part of a compromise.

The Journal reports that the higher SALT write-off “is expected to save taxpayers $29 billion as they file returns this year.” That’s “about as much as the overtime and tips deduction combined.” The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that the reform will “almost exclusively benefit high earners.”

So while Democrats repeat their eat-the-rich rhetoric to gain political points on tax policy, they have fought for years to preserve a tax loophole that overwhelmingly helps rich wage earners in blue states. Cynicism and politics can be a toxic combination.

______