Editorial: Refugee ban betrays a promise to Afghan allies
Published in Op Eds
Republican and Democratic administrations alike benefited from the sacrifices of Afghans who put their lives on the line to support U.S. troops, and spread American values, in the 20-year war against the Taliban. Both have now betrayed the trust those allies placed in them.
The previous White House botched the August 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, ushering the Taliban back into power. It tried to atone in part by smoothing pathways for military interpreters and others who qualified for Special Immigrant Visas, as well as refugees including judges, journalists and women’s rights activists, to emigrate to America. By the end of President Joe Biden’s term, close to 5,000 Afghans a month were successfully resettling in the U.S.
The current administration has thrown the system into turmoil. Its broad-ranging suspension of foreign aid has cut off funds that SIV holders were relying on to travel to the U.S. and upended the resettlement services meant to help them once they arrive, including rent support for their initial months. Meanwhile, a 90-day freeze on refugee admissions has blocked other Afghans who had received approval to migrate — and who rightly fear for their safety.
Together the measures have affected roughly 45,000 SIV applicants ready to fly out of Afghanistan and at least 15,000 qualified refugees, according to the coalition #AfghanEvac. Many of the latter are currently in Pakistan, which has launched a wave of deportations aiming to push migrants back across the border. Thousands of other Afghans whose cases are still in the application process now face uncertain futures.
This second abandonment compounds the damage to U.S. credibility and standing caused by the first. Allies asked to support America in future conflicts will surely wonder whether any promises made to them will last past the next election. China and other rivals have gained yet another example to add to their long narrative of U.S. capriciousness and hypocrisy.
More scrutiny of foreign aid, which the president campaigned on, is fair game. But a blanket refugee ban is cruel and unjustified, as is the pause in aid to organizations supporting food security, education and other critical services around the world. Congress should press the White House to rethink both. In the meantime, legislators from both sides of the aisle should demand that the administration issue waivers for Afghans who have been properly vetted and approved to come to the U.S., as well as for the services they require to reach the country and settle down. Other groups no doubt have strong arguments for relief; that’s no reason to punish Afghans who face legitimate threats of persecution or even death because of their U.S. ties.
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz is a decorated veteran of the war in Afghanistan. He surely knows that the world is too dangerous for the U.S. to make its way without friends. If the administration wants to build “peace through strength,” as it says, it should leave no doubt it will stand by those who risk their lives to stand by America.
____
The Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com/opinion. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Comments