Politics

/

ArcaMax

Commentary: If prosecutors 'followed the science' as they claim, we'd have less crime, not more

Charles "Cully" Stimson, The Heritage Foundation on

Published in Op Eds

“Follow the science” is a common chorus among progressives. But often they, not those they moralize against, are the real science deniers.

Take progressive prosecutors. Many, like George Gascon in Los Angeles, tout their soft-on-crime policies as “data driven” or “scientifically backed.”

Yet this is a complete hoax. These prosecutors cite studies that are misleading, non-replicable, non-peer-reviewed, or entirely disproven.

But the most damning proof that they are science deniers, not science followers, is the simple fact that crime, especially violent crime, has risen dramatically in their jurisdictions.

Of course, none of this has stopped them — and their media cheerleaders — from repeating the “data and science” incantation ad nauseum.

The problem isn’t the use of data or science to support prosecutorial policies. District attorneys have collected data for decades. That’s unsurprising given that the raison d’être of every elected prosecutor is public safety — a goal that data collection significantly furthers.

But instead of using data to protect the public, progressive prosecutors (or, more accurately, rogue prosecutors) collect data as a weapon against opposing viewpoints. They use it to justify recommending shorter sentences, to prevent the prosecutors under them from seeking more than one charge in many cases, and to seek low or no bail in others.

In other cases, rogue prosecutors use data to make prosecutorial decisions based on race and class rather than on public safety. They then reward assistant DAs who implement these progressive agendas — and punish those who dissent.

Fair and Just Prosecution (FJP), the front group for the progressive prosecutor movement, recommends that prosecutors should “adopt performance standards that reflect your values… encourage desired outcomes by adopting metrics like reducing incarceration, pretrial detention, and recidivism…. Include these measures in promotion decisions.”

FJP cautions rogue prosecutors not to consider a defendant’s arrest history when deciding whether to offer them bail, because it “reinforce(s) patterns of racial disparity.”

To support these soft-on-crime actions, rogue prosecutors rely on two main studies – neither of which is either factual or replicable.

In the first study, the chief judge of Cook County, Illinois (home of Chicago), reduced the cash bail amounts in his circuit, which led to more defendants being released before trial. In 2019, the chief judge issued a report stating that “the increased release of defendants from jail did not increase the threat to public safety in Cook County.”

Unfortunately, the exact opposite was true.

In a lengthy expose, the Chicago Tribune detailed the study’s flawed methodology and faulty conclusions. Among other things, the Tribune reported, the judge undercounted murders, limited his definition of “violent crime” to six offenses, and only counted the first new charge against released defendants, even when those defendants were charged with multiple new crimes.

 

A Wake Forest University law review article (written by a retired federal judge and former federal prosecutor) also noted that the study failed to control for many other factors and ignored confounding variables.

These authors found that “the number of crimes committed by pretrial releasees appear(ed)… to have significantly increased.” In fact, “the number of released defendants charged with committing new crimes increased by about 45 percent…(and) the number of pretrial releasees charged with new violent crimes increased by about 33%.”

The second study cited by rogue prosecutors has been similarly discredited.

The study contended that “marginal non-prosecuted misdemeanor defendant(s)” were 53% less likely to face criminal complaints in the next two years than similar defendants who were prosecuted. After this study’s release, then-DA of Suffolk County (home of Boston) used it to support her decision not to prosecute non-violent misdemeanors.

But this study, like the Chicago bail study, made crucial errors.

Instead of examining all criminal defendants in Suffolk County or even all misdemeanor offenders, the study only considered first-time misdemeanor offenders. But the pertinent question is not whether the first-time misdemeanor offenders will re-offend; many will not, regardless of whether they’re prosecuted. The real issue is whether the whole group of people that the DA decided to let off the hook — a group that includes repeat offenders — would likely re-offend.

In other words, the study examined only the most favorable subset of the data and ignored the data most likely to refute its hypothesis. It also failed to distinguish between cases that were charged, cases that were diverted to a non-punitive forum for resolution, and cases that were dropped.

Worse, the study used data that’s inaccessible and irreplicable.

Data and science aren’t the problem. The problem is the way rogue prosecutors use both words. Saying the words “data” and “science” repeatedly may sound credible, but after pulling back the curtain, one discovers that rogue prosecutors’ appeals to “data and science” are nothing more than a smokescreen — a “data and science” hoax.

____

Charles "Cully" Stimson is the Deputy Director of The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and co-author of “Rogue Prosecutors: How Radical Soros Lawyers Are Destroying America’s Communities.”

_____


©2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

ACLU

ACLU

By The ACLU
Amy Goodman

Amy Goodman

By Amy Goodman
Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

By Ben Shapiro
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Bill Press

Bill Press

By Bill Press
Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

By Bonnie Jean Feldkamp
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
Christine Flowers

Christine Flowers

By Christine Flowers
Clarence Page

Clarence Page

By Clarence Page
Danny Tyree

Danny Tyree

By Danny Tyree
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Debra Saunders

Debra Saunders

By Debra Saunders
Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

By Dennis Prager
Dick Polman

Dick Polman

By Dick Polman
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
Froma Harrop

Froma Harrop

By Froma Harrop
Jacob Sullum

Jacob Sullum

By Jacob Sullum
Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

By Jamie Stiehm
Jeff Robbins

Jeff Robbins

By Jeff Robbins
Jessica Johnson

Jessica Johnson

By Jessica Johnson
Jim Hightower

Jim Hightower

By Jim Hightower
Joe Conason

Joe Conason

By Joe Conason
Joe Guzzardi

Joe Guzzardi

By Joe Guzzardi
John Micek

John Micek

By John Micek
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Marc Munroe Dion

Marc Munroe Dion

By Marc Munroe Dion
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Michael Reagan

Michael Reagan

By Michael Reagan
Mona Charen

Mona Charen

By Mona Charen
Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

By Oliver North and David L. Goetsch
R. Emmett Tyrrell

R. Emmett Tyrrell

By R. Emmett Tyrrell
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
Robert B. Reich

Robert B. Reich

By Robert B. Reich
Ruben Navarrett Jr

Ruben Navarrett Jr

By Ruben Navarrett Jr.
Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus

By Ruth Marcus
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Susan Estrich

Susan Estrich

By Susan Estrich
Ted Rall

Ted Rall

By Ted Rall
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Tom Purcell

Tom Purcell

By Tom Purcell
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Mike Luckovich Pat Bagley Mike Smith Michael Ramirez Bill Bramhall Marshall Ramsey